![]() PK had been demonstrated in the experiment. TheĪuthor concluded from the excessive number of significant sessions that Psi-hitting direction and two were in the psi-missing direction. Of the nine significant sessions, seven were in the Of theģ2 subjects, 9 achieved independently significant scores, whereas onlyġ.6 would be expected by chance, assuming an alpha criterion of. Significant variability among the scores of individual subjects. Scores were based on two or eight test tubes. Significant difference whether Ps attempted to influence their own blood Performance in the experimental and control trials, nor did it make any The main analysis indicated no significant difference between The theory makesĭifferential predictions as to the results in the two- and eight-tube The hemolysis effect was going to be stronger anyway. Might use precognition to assign as experimental those trials in which Responsible for randomizing the order of experimental and control trials Theory (May, Utts, & Spottiswoode, 1995), which maintains thatĪpparent micro-PK effects (under which rubric the hemolysis task wouldįall) are in fact caused by ESP. Manipulation was introduced to allow a test of decision augmentation Tested in the experimental and control conditions, respectively. On groups of either two or eight test tubes, resulting in 10 tubes being Prior to theįirst trial, Ps listened to a progressive relaxation and guided imagery tape over headphones.ĭuring each of the four trials, E performed the hemolysis procedure E wasīlind as to which two trials were the experimental ones. Not to think about the red blood cells, and if that was impossible, toĬoncentrate on having the hemolysis occur at the normal rate. The test room while having the opportunity to observe a photo of healthyīlood cells if they so chose. Which Ps were to concentrate on retarding the hemolysis taking place in Two of these trials,Īs determined by a random process, were experimental trials, during These measurements canīe graphed, demonstrating the time course of the hemolysis during theĮach session consisted of four 15-min trials. ![]() Were recorded during each trial, i.e., 1 per s. Light beam through the test tube and recording the amount of light that Spectrophotometer charts the progress of the hemolysis by passing a When red blood cells burst, the solution becomes more transparent. Tube was placed inside a spectrophotometer that measures the hemolysis. After the contents were mixed by shaking, the test Transferring blood to a test tube containing a concentration of. Separated from the room in which the hemolysis procedure would be ![]() Own (presumably supplied by the other 14). Whereas the remaining 18 attempted to influence blood that was not their ![]() Participants (Ps) donated their own blood to be used in the experiment, Our replication is reportedĮlsewhere (Palmer, Simmonds, & Baumann, 2006).īraud (1990) tested 32 volunteers in his study. Previously undetected statistical artifact. Well-designed experiment by William Braud (1990) that apparentlyĭemonstrated remote mental influence on the hemolysis of red bloodĬells, I studied the report in some detail. In preparing to conduct a conceptual replication of a generally APA style: A statistical artifact in William Braud's (1990) experiment on remote mental influence of hemolysis.A statistical artifact in William Braud's (1990) experiment on remote mental influence of hemolysis." Retrieved from (1990)+experiment+on+remote.-a0185487254 MLA style: "A statistical artifact in William Braud's (1990) experiment on remote mental influence of hemolysis." The Free Library.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |